Francis Fukuyama' s idea of human dignity Essay

Francis Fukuyama s idea of hu valet de chambre dignity - Essay ExampleFrancis Fukuyama pronounce that man has not yet reached the end of history for man has not yet reached the end of science. The give-and-take of the consequences of biotechnology does comprise the strongest part of Fukuyamas latest book. Francis Fukuyama is able to stress out the ways in which man is benefiting from the surfacing of biotechnology as he stated in his emergent theory with this idea it is doable to reconcile his idea with Surowiecki with regard to maintaining benignant dignity amidst mans continuous use of biotechnology.The author is popular for his statements on biotechnology and human dignity more than a decade ago that, because the other possibilities to liberal egalitarianism had pushed themselves, history as we knew it was at a conclusion.Fukuyamas objective is not simply to describe the consequences of biotechnology, but to asseverate that biotechnology suggests unwelcome consequences both t he designation of man and the existing communal structure. Fukuyama promotes that government institutions should be acknowledge to assess and standardize biotechnological innovations.The revolution of biotechnology as an emergence of progress and development is very unornamented with the rise into power of the breakthroughs in the pharmaceutical industry wherein medicines atomic number 18 now aimed not only to regain diseases but also to improve the existing normal conditions. For example, Prozac is used by people who are not depressed to increase confidence and reduce shyness Ritalin is used by adults who do not have attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder to increase their capacity to focus attention for sustained periods and the antinarcoleptic Modafil is used by long-distance truck drivers who do not have narcolepsy to reduce their need for sleep. Nanotechnology is responsible for transmissible modifications boastful man the power to create their ideal man by selection of traits that affects the genetic makeup of futurity offspring. In vitro fertilization together with preimplantation genetic diagnosis now makes it possible to avoid the implantation of embryos with genes for real disease or to select for sex. Human cloning has been a long-term debatable topic when it comes to biotechnology. there has been a widespread opposition to it. Many commentators have expressed a wide variety of concerns close to these advances, such as their very worrisome potential to increase inequalities between those who can afford genetic enhancements for their children and those who cannot. It is unquestionable that our equal moral status, or worth, rests on certain properties we share, or as Fukuyama puts it, on our commonplace human nature. Few argue that it is morally wrong to kill bacteria pre summationably this is because the bacteria wish these properties. Fukuyama defines human nature as the sum of the behavior and characteristics that are typical of the h uman species, arising from genetic instead than environmental factors. (Fukuyama, 217)Its worth noting that by this definition, human nature is an empty concept, because no human behavior or characteristic arises only from genetic rather than environmental factors-all are the result of complex interplay of those factors. But linguistic context this difficulty aside, what is the common nature that could ground our human dignity and rights Fukuyama argues that it is the way language, reason, moral choice and emotions compounding in humans that gives us human dignity. Our dignity rests on what he calls factor out X, some inherent human quality underneath contingent and accidental characteristics that is worthy of a certain minimal level of respect. (Fukuyama, 136) This human essence is a whole that is greater than the sum of its parts If what gives us dignity and a moral status higher than that of other living creatures is related to the fact that we are complex wholes rather than the sum of simple parts, then it is clear that there is no simple answer to the question, What is Factor X That is, Factor X cannot be reduced to the possession of moral choice, or reason, or language,