Sunday, June 16, 2019
UN and Internal conflicts of the 1990s Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words
UN and Internal conflicts of the 1990s - Essay ExampleMostly those that train undergone civil strife within the warring factions in the local communities were given humanitarian relief instead of striving towards the achievement of peace through peacekeeping and peacebuilding missions, especially due to ethnic and cultural conflicts.Brahm (2005) mentions that the lack of central authority in nations that experienced tragic deaths due to ethnic and cultural conflicts makes it difficult for the UN to act, when it is in fact the UN that should already serve as the main central authority. Brahm also cites that the UN is known to act towards existing crises, not preventing them. He continues to note that although the UN Secretary-General at the m of post by Boutros Boutros-Ghali and Kofi Annan was effective in extending a diplomatic hand in negotiations and interventions without the requirement of the Security Councils go-signal, it is still the Security Council who is main executor of resolutions and actions that will mesh missions. The commitment value of the Member States in assuring thorough relief and support in aiding the nations involved with civil strife based on governmental and cultural differences, according to Brahm, is way low, and primarily the difficulties lie in the finger-pointing of who will provide continuous advocacy that will eventually help these state afflicted nations towards their own deliverance. In this we agree. Most of the times the UN has been seen to act based on the individual interests of the Member States, and if it is something that does not involve their nations benefiting from such a situation, it is roughly likely that they are not as keen to offer sincere assistance. Still, there prevail been resolutions that the UN has successfully produced and achieved. Mostly these resolutions are where all parties involved have reached an agreement and has finally acknowledged the need for a peace accord. Peacekeeping missions theref ore were widely supported by Member States, as they are appoint to protect diplomatic relations by safeguarding civilians and state officials, restoration of order, helping refuges, enforcing human rights, even monitoring political environment. The opinion that peacebuilding is a Western conception and therefore is not applicable in most of the cases where peacebuilding was targeted to be achieved as Brahm (2005) has stated in his essay may sound questionable in itself, however is legitimate in the sense that it should be taken into context within that particular situation. The Security Council must always take into consideration the need for discernment the historical root cause of an event such as political and civil strife in non-Western countries and use this understanding in its decision devising process to reach a solid and firm resolution towards the nature of peacebuilding mission they are to send to that afflicted country. Majority of the main issues that the UN must sustain and acknowledge belong to its inabilities category, where the UNs failure to respond the soonest possible time to internal conflicts is due to its delay in identifying a threat to the peace as based on
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.