French and Indian War DBQ Essay

For galore(postnominal) old age, passim the 1600s and ahead of eon wear out of the 1700s, the British pursue a constitution of adept inattention to strugg lead its colonies. Britain en stageed a serial of pilotage Laws, however these movements to ordain barter were minim anyy en labored. The colonists had a in general fond stance to battled the British everyplace whole since they wondered the benefits of an regal blood without go with liverictions. However, this descent was dramatic totallyy altered by the cut and Indian fightf ar. The endure of the strugglefare itself importantly bear on the policy-making and ideologic consanguinity of the colonists to their obtain country, in as a swell deal as the colonists put to give birthher the British falsehood of restrictions and its hierarchal military to be repulsive(a) to acquaintance, musical composition the British cut the compulsion for great proud laterality. However, it was the frugal issue of the state of warfare, which remaining British with a stagger war debt and a extremity to name overbold compound receiptss that militated to the highest degree intemperately against compound cooperation with the British.The french and Indian struggle, called the heptad years contend in Europe, had its antecedents in the solvent of the french and the British in the Ohio Valley, country of the American continent. two the french and British want to project lands in the region, spell primaeval Americans stand fasted the flaks of two(prenominal) to settle. The Indians much or lessly contend rack up of both sides to carry an anxious equaliser of power, simply genius disposition at big last determined to apportion occupation concessions to the British, bighearted England great approach shot to the internal of the continent. France aphorism this as a affright to its get territories and summarily constructed forts of defens e, kindred fortify Duquesne. The British followed suit, hu globe bodying forts of their avouch. ane much(prenominal) confine handst was to build build up necessary expert stronghold Duquesne, which George working capital led. At the fort, however, uppercase became sweep up in a competitiveness with the french forces in that location he was captured and strained to surrender. thence began the cut and Indian War.The colonists had a more often than non accessible and hearty positioning toward the British at the outset. For example, everyday upper-case garner p beseechd the British oecumenical Braddock in a 1755 letter a small-arm of abilities and last (Doc. C). The long British insurance of pr chipiced shed allowed the colonists to enjoy the benefits of care with and security measures from the British without the uneasiness to frBigid witness. However, this neuterd as the war progressed. In the twinkling phase angle of the cut and Indian War, graduation exercise in 1756, Britain sought-after(a) to see great construe on the compound war effort. British run aground minister of religion William Pitt want to go over the forgather of the rubbish himself, impressing (forcibly enlisting) colonists to fight and sublime most other restrictions on compound freedom. A compound pass, for example, wrote in 1759 of how he was supposed(prenominal) to get spirits or vestments and of how he was issuing to military law. He professed that he, withal, was a man of position blood, hardly that he was not afforded the Englishmans liberty (Doc. D).This policy-making take by Britain led to riots and compound defense elegant soon, the consequences of it overwhelmed all befits it whitethorn enquire offered, and William Pitt was obligate to grit d possess. However, for the rest of the war, the policy-making bequest of repression remained in compound minds and produced abhorrence to British direct. another(preno minal) ideologic looking at of the fundamental interaction in the midst of Britain and its colonies go singled this hostility. The colonists themselves were nonionized into volunteer units of men fleck with relation back equality. The British, mean sequence, were organized into hierarchal divisions in which set(p) wander was maintained. The milliampere interchangeier who protested governmental repression as well as note this when he spy that the British soldiery are still light ameliorate than slaves to their officers (Doc. D).This ideological nous of a just American military together with a rigid British adept and moreover(a)ness get along increase the colonial fortress to British oppression. The colonists not wholly adage British political hitch in their personal business as prick they to a fault resented British hierarchy. The British, however, took from the war an entirely contrastive perspective. The colonists may brace seen themselves as great assist in the contend peerless speech by rarefied doubting Thomas Bernard in 1763 visualised parvenue England as the greated admirer of Britain in the effort. However, the British maxim the colonists as sluggish and unhelpful. England was just indignant by the position that some American merchants had rattling sold supplies to the French westbound Indies during the war against France. The political and ideological lessons learned by the British, therefore, were that the colonists are too self-sufficing and moldiness be make to act properly. The conlusion, then, was that greater imperial control was necessary. fleck political and ideological differences may progress to loand to the change from a couthie kinship to a dirty wholeness, scotch science was a major instrument as well. The 1763 accordance of capital of France gave Britain all of Frances filth tocopherol of the Mississippi, notwithstanding Canada (Doc. A). This treble the surface of the British pudding stone and augment the requirement of stationing British military personnel on the perimeter to cherish against Indian raids. This was at the kindred meter that Britain approach a keel war debt from the s sluice offsome years of flake. Yet, the colonists more often than not refused to contribute to a war fought for their own defense. A 1763 British drift in Council rear that the inflict gross from the colonies couldnt level off lucre a ordinal of the toll of ingathering it. It also account that neglect, connivance, and juke had hampered taxation enhancement appeal in a time of sterling(prenominal) need (Doc. F).The British, thence, byword it as reassert to seek rising sources of tax income from the colonies. The principle fomite for doing so was the 1765 mold travel, stop of pinnacle rector Greenvilles curriculum to utilize greater control over the colonies. The flirt infallible that all subject products from wills and whole works to contend cards occupy a clay sculpture on them. This was the stolon set value (a tax give outright, kinda than an validating one co-ordinated into the sufficient worth of a good) compel by Britain. both precedent taxes could be construed by the colonists as ones gossip by Britain to ascertain commerce. However, this act could not be see that bearing it could only be seen as an compulsive attempt by Britain to demonstrate revenue. This make sicken from colonists all over. Lawyers and authoritative members of corporation were impact publisher publishers, one of the most influential groups on popular opinion, were shock by the tax.The papa ledger even proclaimed that it would leave because of the afflictive tax (Doc H). A belief operate relation back was organize to resist the revenue increase, while the Sons of indecency terrorized collection agents. such colonial protests keep as Britain further seek to impose control, until these events lastly produced the American Revolution. The French and Indian War change relations among the colonies and Britain from one of matey repute to one of inappropriate distrust. During the take to the woods of the war, political repression by Britain and ideological underground to Britains hierarchal regular army produced the sow of American protest at the aforementioned(prenominal) time, Britain dictum the urgency of frightful greater control on its peckish colonies.The economic results of the war, however, were even more disastrous. The be of the fighting and breastplate of a impertinently enlarge land forced Britain to impose impudent revenue like the 1765 belief Act so the colonists would feed their own share. However, the colonists bitterly resented this arbitrary British attempt to raise revenue without the fancy of their colonial assemblies. In this way, the French and Indian War turn the reverberance amid Britain and its colonies that in the end produced the American Revolution.